Celebrity

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: Our celebrity obsessions and the pathology of fame

Thought Depp v. Heard, the six-week trial held in a Virginia courtroom tasked with adjudicating a defamation swimsuit filed by actor Johnny Depp towards his spouse, fellow-actor Amber Heard, might have been tawdry — given all that soiled laundry aired in public earlier than the trial concluded on June 1 — it was the tawdriness, incongruously, that raised seminal questions on what social scientists name the phenomenology of fame, which humble people like us who communicate plain English take as a reference to each folks’s obsession with movie star and the ruinous results of movie star standing on the mindset of the celebrated.

I’ll let you know this earlier than we transfer on: I discovered the trial to be a snoozer, in contrast to these tens of millions of People and tens of millions extra elsewhere world wide who watched it being massively lined reside on TV. The trial was a snoozer, I felt, as a result of it panned out to be, from gavel to gavel, a he-said, she-said mudslinging fest between two folks with a “gap within the soul”, a time period initially utilized by blues artists to confer with the lack of magnificence and which means in trendy American music, however one which lately we have now picked as much as describe people who, although they’ve all of it, really feel an vacancy on the core of their being.

So, what’s it with celebrities and, sure, why have they turn out to be a central fixation in our lives, in our tradition, in our media and, darn it, at occasions in our ideas?

I see the connection we have now with celebrities as being symbiotic — a phrase we have now appropriated from Greek that tellingly means “residing collectively” — and like different symbiotic relationships there’s one thing in for each events.

World of glitz and glamour

And what’s in it, you ask, for celebrities? Stardom, that world of glitz and glamour inhabited by the “lovely folks”, people with seems to be that swivel eyes, who elegantly stroll the purple carpet garbed in dear brand-name robes or equally dear custom-made tuxedos. Of us prepared with a bon mot once they obtain awards in recognition of their skills, charisma and élan as movie, music, sports activities, media and political main lights.

Of us with oodles of cash (Johnny reportedly has a $100 million property portfolio, whereas Amber, properly, not a lot, although the final time we checked, she was not on meals stamps) who reside in spacious mansions, journey on non-public jects, keep in ritzy motels and social gathering in fashionable golf equipment.

And what’s in it for us? The prospect to reside these people’ lives and be who and what they’re — even when solely vicariously. Celebrities, by definition of their type, embody the polish we aspire to own. We watch, admire and emulate them. They’re so interwoven into the social material, the preoccupations of our tradition and even, on a subliminal stage, our quotidian lives, that we deal with them like household, like associates, like colleagues, alternately idolising them, as we did Muhamad Ali, for his achievement-based bravado; demonising them, as we did Vanessa Redgrave for her ideological views; and penalise them, as we did Invoice Cosby for his villainous acts.

And we love them so even when — certainly, at occasions particularly when — they go engagingly rogue, morphing into rascals who break guidelines and mock norms, the “cool dudes” in our creativeness we hint again all the best way from James Dean to Malcolm X and, extra not too long ago, from Hunter S. Thompson to Mick Jagger — rebels with a trigger we undertaking ourselves on.

However wait. Actually, it’s all hall-of-mirrors.

The movie star self and the genuine self

Celebrities — who, as soon as fame hits, discover their persona break up into two, the movie star self and the genuine self — are basically tormented souls who had made a pact with the Satan, who they now discover lurking across the nook asking for his charge this charge to be paid. They’re trapped in a Sartrean huis clos, a fenced-in synthetic world that many battle however usually fail to flee. Not all decide up and go, as Marlon Brando did, to Tahiti, in quest of a sheltering refuge from the terrors of fight

in Hollywood, refusing to attend the Academy Award ceremony in 1973 and to just accept the Oscar it needed to current him for his efficiency in The Godfather.

Oh, celebrities. We would like a lot to be them however, when all of it will get all the way down to the get-down, they extra so need to be us.

In August 2013, Amber Heard complained to a reporter about how she wished she may, a lot as unusual people like us may, take a nice stroll within the park, go looking for groceries and sit on the terrace in her neighbourhood cafe sipping on an espresso with out being observed or bothered.

“I need to be an artist”, she stated. “I don’t need to be a star”.

Sorry, Amber, The 2 come as one. In right now’s world, definitely in right now’s America, being an artist and being a star are a bundle deal. You reside with it and eventually you get used to it — a situation that’s each the satisfaction and burden of those that are so unlucky as to be saddled by fame and fortune.

Fawaz Turki is a famous thinker, tutorial and writer primarily based in Washington DC. He’s the writer of The Disinherited: Journal of a Palestinian Exile

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.